Thank you. That explanation is very helpful.

Yes

Yes

yes

yes

Yes

yes

Yes.

yes

OK

yes

Yes

include

Phobias Yes

yes for phobias

include

Yes

Yes

Sorry I need to step away for 10 minutes

We need to underscore the need for any practitioner to be suitably trained for all interventions

Thanks @rachael. This is precisely the point that I was concerned about in some of the low income contexts that I have some familiarity with.

Thank you Kim! I’ll say yes, then!

Thanks so much for your comments and reassurances. I'd go for a Yes then.

Include

include

Yes

include

include

Given the detailed discussion which has highlighted the issues I would include

Definitely

Yes

include

Include

Include

Yes

There is growing research that adolescents and adults with ID are using/abusing substances to cope with the pain of trauma and isolation/loneliness

psychotic disorders as well

Schizophrenia/psychosis

Sounds logical

I agree

Yes, I agree with Marc. Thanks

Include

include

Include

yes include

Include

of course

include

include

include

include

include

Yes

Yes again I think this is another cross cutting issue

Consultation is also an option often used. Treatment intervention remains with the "team" with guidance from a specialist professional

good idea

more appropriate

I agree

Sounds more inclusive

Yes

agree

Agree

sounds good to me

Yes

yes definitely

yes!

agree

How is this different from Assessment of Mental Health? (previously listed)

Yes

Agree

agree

Agree

agree

Yes

include

Yes

Yes

Include

Include

Yes.

Yes

Yes

yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

yes

I am not familiar with "interpersonal psychotherapy" can you explain it?

Thank you

Same reason as before, evidence is strong in the general population but methodologically weak in the IDD population. I do not have experience of this intervention and do not know of any current research being undertaken in this field

Likewise here. I do not feel qualified to comment on it.

People with ID were excluded as a criterion of participation in these studies — ethical problem

Evidence not strong, doesn’t appear to be new research in this area, I would exclude

include

Include

I also agree with that comment and wonder if there is enough evidence here - especially for a manualized treatment that has not been translated

I think as an evidence based treatment IPT is included in treatment of persons with depression and if a person with ID has depression, IPT ought to be included

Can we move IPT to Depression?

I agree with Marc, it should be under depression in ID

Agree

In light of Kermin and Ashok comments I change my decision to include but targeted for depression

include

I am not familiar with the intervention but with Kerims expertise it sounds important for including with a depression target

include for emotional disorders

I’m not familiar with the intervention at all. Sorry

Include

Can we return to it later?

Yes

It sounds to me that this is covered under the assessment of emotional functions.The ICF definition is as follows: Specific mental functions related to the feeling and affective components of the processes of the mind.Inclusionsfunctions of appropriateness of emotion, regulation and range of emotion; affect; sadness, happiness, love, fear, anger, hate, tension, anxiety, joy, sorrow; lability of emotion; flattening of affect

include

include

I see... then include

Include

yes

include

ok

Include

Absolutely

Yes!

Yes

yes

Definitely

yes

yes

YES!

Yes

yes absolutely

yes

SSRI - Yes

yes

Include SSRIs

SSRI yes

yes

Include SSRIs

do not specify

Agree with Ashok

It would allow for changes as the studies evolve. Don't specify

All ages, caution for children <5 years

We need to be guided by the evidence for each of these three populations. Im not a psychiatrist but think better prescribed for young adults / adults not young children

Agree. best to avoid th every young

Disagree 6-12 should be included

These are very safe medications if they are monitored and dose titrated

I would like to see evidence for prescribing in young er children

Sorry should have been clearer very young is 5 nd below!

Think about it more

Difficult as not my area but am comfortable to be guided by the experts here

Bye

Thank you Bye

bye

thank you. bye

thank you